Hi everybody, I was wondering if anyone has any experience on bindings between LW(M) and JVM. What's the current state of affairs? Are there any libraries available? mikas _______________________________________________ Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users lisp-hug@lispworks.com http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html
Hi everybody,
I was wondering if anyone has any experience on bindings between LW(M) and JVM. What's the current state of affairs? Are there any libraries available?
mikas
_______________________________________________
Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
lisp-hug@lispworks.com
http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html
Unable to parse email body. Email id is 13128
Java is at the core of any Android device!
Ala'a
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 2:58 AM, David McClain
<dbm@refined-audiometrics.com> wrote:
>
> This is rather surprising - to me at least... I had the impression that Java was finally dying out, not least because of the strangle-hold on it by Oracle, and secondly as a result of the serious security flaws found in it last year or so. Just what I've heard, but I'm not Java saavy. So please feel free to counter with some facts.
>
> - DM
>
>
>
> On Jul 3, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Martin Simmons <martin@lispworks.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Mika,
>>
>> LispWorks 7.0 will include an interface to the JVM. We expect a beta release
>> to be available shortly, so if you would like to be a beta tester then please
>> send an email to lisp-support@lispworks.com (don't ask questions about it here
>> because it will be under NDA).
>>
>> --
>> Martin Simmons
>> LispWorks Ltd
>> http://www..lispworks.com/
>>
>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:39:46 +0300, mkuuskan said:
>>>
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> I was wondering if anyone has any experience on bindings between LW(M) and
>>> JVM. What's the current state of affairs? Are there any libraries available?
>>>
>>> mikas
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
>>> lisp-hug@lispworks.com
>>> http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
>> lisp-hug@lispworks.com
>> http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html
>>
>>
>
>
>
> 73 de Dave, N7AIG
>
> David McClain
> N7AIG@arrl.net
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
> lisp-hug@lispworks.com
> http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html
>
_______________________________________________
Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
lisp-hug@lispworks.com
http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html
On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 15:52:37 +0100, Denis Pousseur <denis.pousseur@gmail.com> wrote: > > Popularity of langages in 2013, TIOBE > (http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html) : > > 1 : C > 2 : Java > 3 : Objective-C > …. > 14 : Lisp The picture is slightly more complicated since it displays .NET languages as separate from each other. If .NET was considered by the rating as a platform it would likely be a close third after Java. > > It’s true that Java had declined last years… but, starting from 25% 12 > years ago, it is now at 16.1% - just after C (16.2%) - and seems to be > stabilized. This score is still 20 times better than Lisp, so « dying > out » is maybe a little bit excessive expression... For me, any bridge > to some of the most popular languages is a good and pragmatic strategy > for a Lisp implementation. LW has already some very efficient C and > Objective-C interfaces, so adding a Java interface is a logical (and > welcome) prolongation. > > Best regards > ------------------------------------------------ > Denis Pousseur > 70 rue de Wansijn > 1180 Bruxelles > + 32 2 219 31 09 > http://www.denispousseur.com > ------------------------------------------------ > > Le 4 juil. 2014 à 00:58, David McClain <dbm@refined-audiometrics.com> a > écrit : > >> >> This is rather surprising - to me at least... I had the impression that >> Java was finally dying out, not least because of the strangle-hold on >> it by Oracle, and secondly as a result of the serious security flaws >> found in it last year or so. Just what I've heard, but I'm not Java >> saavy. So please feel free to counter with some facts. >> >> - DM >> >> >> >> On Jul 3, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Martin Simmons <martin@lispworks.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Mika, >>> >>> LispWorks 7.0 will include an interface to the JVM. We expect a beta >>> release >>> to be available shortly, so if you would like to be a beta tester then >>> please >>> send an email to lisp-support@lispworks.com (don't ask questions about >>> it here >>> because it will be under NDA). >>> >>> -- >>> Martin Simmons >>> LispWorks Ltd >>> http://www.lispworks.com/ >>> >>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:39:46 +0300, mkuuskan said: >>>> >>>> Hi everybody, >>>> >>>> I was wondering if anyone has any experience on bindings between >>>> LW(M) and >>>> JVM. What's the current state of affairs? Are there any libraries >>>> available? >>>> >>>> mikas >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users >>>> lisp-hug@lispworks.com >>>> http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users >>> lisp-hug@lispworks.com >>> http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html >>> >>> >> >> >> >> 73 de Dave, N7AIG >> >> David McClain >> N7AIG@arrl.net >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users >> lisp-hug@lispworks.com >> http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users > lisp-hug@lispworks.com > http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html _______________________________________________ Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users lisp-hug@lispworks.com http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html