Re: user-defined external format?
FLEXI-STREAMS doesn't directly support the Lotus Notes external
format, but it should be fairly easy to add that.
It is indeed true that FLEXI-STREAMS - because it tries to be flexible
and to work across many different Lisps - isn't very efficient
compared to native implementations. The 1.0.x versions are a lot
faster than older releases, though.
Cheers,
Edi.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Dmitry Ivanov <ystok-systema@rambler.ru> wrote:
>
> Raymond Wiker wrote on Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:48:38 +0100 15:48:
>
> | I'm working on some code that interfaces with the Lotus Notes C API.
> | Lotus Notes us something called LMBCS[1] internally, which does not
> | seem to be supported directly by Lispworks. (LMBCS is based on CodePage
> | 850, but with "shift codes" to access characters outside the CP850
> | set).
> |
> | Is there a way to extend the set of external formats available in
> | Lispworks?
>
> I believe many of the Russians miss KOI8-R, the most popular encoding
> of Russian on *nix.
>
> Edi's flexi-streams supports CP850, KOI8-R, and almost every encoding
> one could wish. It is quite universal but is not very efficient IMHO.
> --
> Sincerely,
> Dmitry Ivanov
> lisp.ystok.ru
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
> lisp-hug@lispworks.com
> http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html
>
_______________________________________________
Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
lisp-hug@lispworks.com
http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html