Re: Acquisition of LispWorks and Liquid Common Lisp

On Jan 4, 2005, at 12:48 PM, Young, David wrote:

> Well, it's not the *only* thing. For me, the entire IDE model that 
> Lispworks
> adopted is superior to Allegro's; the former has a "working within a 
> Lisp
> machine" feel to it, while ACL seems to say "let's build a gui". My 
> opinion,
> of course.

Of course, of course.   I also feel that the LW IDE is much better.

Cheers

marco


>
> -- david
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marco Antoniotti [mailto:marcoxa@cs.nyu.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 12:44 PM
> To: 'lisp-hug@xanalys.com' LispWorks
> Subject: Re: Acquisition of LispWorks and Liquid Common Lisp
>
>
>
> Of course, for the future, please do not change the royalty-free
> application distribution terms.  This is what sets you apart from
> Franz.
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Marco Antoniotti
> http://bioinformatics.nyu.edu
> NYU Courant Bioinformatics Group		tel. +1 - 212 - 998 3488
> 715 Broadway 10th FL				fax. +1 - 212 - 998 3484
> New York, NY, 10003, U.S.A.
>
> This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipients(s) 
> and may contain confidential and privileged information of Bloodhound 
> Software, Inc.. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure is 
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
> sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
--
Marco Antoniotti					http://bioinformatics.nyu.edu
NYU Courant Bioinformatics Group		tel. +1 - 212 - 998 3488
715 Broadway 10th FL				fax. +1 - 212 - 998 3484
New York, NY, 10003, U.S.A.