This causes an error in LWL Personal Edition 4.3.6: (let ((str (make-array 0 :element-type 'character :adjustable t :fill-pointer 0))) (vector-push-extend #\4 str) (vector-push-extend #\2 str) (vector-push-extend #\) str) (parse-integer str :junk-allowed t)) But this does not: (parse-integer "42)" :junk-allowed t) Is this a bug in LWL or in my understanding of Common Lisp? Thanks for your assistance. -russ
Russel McManus wrote: > This causes an error in LWL Personal Edition 4.3.6: > > (let ((str (make-array 0 :element-type 'character :adjustable t :fill-pointer 0))) > (vector-push-extend #\4 str) > (vector-push-extend #\2 str) > (vector-push-extend #\) str) > (parse-integer str :junk-allowed t)) I think this is a bug that was fixed in version 4.3.7. Regards, Arthur Lemmens
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 17:17:39 -0400, Russell McManus <russell_mcmanus@yahoo.com> wrote: > This causes an error in LWL Personal Edition 4.3.6: > > (let ((str (make-array 0 :element-type 'character :adjustable t :fill-pointer 0))) > (vector-push-extend #\4 str) > (vector-push-extend #\2 str) > (vector-push-extend #\) str) > (parse-integer str :junk-allowed t)) > > But this does not: > > (parse-integer "42)" :junk-allowed t) > > Is this a bug in LWL or in my understanding of Common Lisp? > > Thanks for your assistance. That's a bug in 4.3.6 that was fixed in 4.3.7 - you should upgrade. Cheers, Edi.
Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de> writes: > On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 17:17:39 -0400, Russell McManus <russell_mcmanus@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> This causes an error in LWL Personal Edition 4.3.6: >> >> (let ((str (make-array 0 :element-type 'character :adjustable t :fill-pointer 0))) >> (vector-push-extend #\4 str) >> (vector-push-extend #\2 str) >> (vector-push-extend #\) str) >> (parse-integer str :junk-allowed t)) >> >> But this does not: >> >> (parse-integer "42)" :junk-allowed t) >> >> Is this a bug in LWL or in my understanding of Common Lisp? >> >> Thanks for your assistance. > > That's a bug in 4.3.6 that was fixed in 4.3.7 - you should upgrade. I just downloaded personal edition again, and it's still at 4.3.6. -russ
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 17:55:37 -0400, Russell McManus <russell_mcmanus@yahoo.com> wrote: > I just downloaded personal edition again, and it's still at 4.3.6. Dave Fox posted a message to this list about a week ago stating that the Personal Edition has been upgraded to 4.3.7. If your download is still 4.3.6 you might want to report this as a bug. Edi.
Unable to parse email body. Email id is 2407
davef@xanalys.com writes: > I just downloaded personal edition again, and it's still at 4.3.6. > > In case this is still a problem: > > - Did you actually install the new version? > - Did you install via rpm or tar archive? > - Did you install the tar archive in a different location to the previous version? > (if so, the old version is still on your machine). > - Why do you believe the image is still at version 4.3.6? Dave- Thank you for taking the time to respond to my question. You indeed are correct that the personal edition is at 4.3.7; I screwed up the installation onto my machine, and then ran the old version after I thought I had deleted it. Sorry for the noise. -russ