[Barry Wilkes] Re: 'Extending' require?
tarvydas <tarvydas@allstream.net> writes: > Have you already tried the &optional arg for require and / or *modules* > specified by the CLHS? > pt I'm aware of this. That's not what I'm looking for. Barry.
tarvydas <tarvydas@allstream.net> writes: > Have you already tried the &optional arg for require and / or *modules* > specified by the CLHS? > pt I'm aware of this. That's not what I'm looking for. Barry.
Barry Wilkes <bew@bcs.org.uk> writes: > I'm aware of this. That's not what I'm looking for. What are you looking for? A search path mechanism? (Maybe I should make my little "smart-require" thing public. It works approximately like require, but does on-demand compiling and allows you to set a search path for source files and requires you to set a destination directory for .fasl files. In addition it does some extra tricks, like picking up $Id...$ from rcs/cvs headers. Not much really (250 lines of code), but I find it quite useful and think I'm happier with something like this than with defsystem.) -- (espen)